Taiwan

WE T91 GBB , availible by CWI Airsoft
www.bbdragon.com.tw

Duration : 0:1:59

Read the rest of this entry »

The capital of Taiwan Province? And I mean Taiwan Province ROC, not the PRC’s claim.

25,549 as of Feb. 2010.
Fyi, there’s no such thing as Taiwan Province any more. It’s been abolished since 1997.

The ROC is mostly made up of Taiwan, but there’s also a couple of tiny islands included in the ROC, too, therefore making it different. So why is the ROC flag the same as the Taiwanese flag?
The Republic of China is not the China that you know of! The ROC is completely different! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_China

In the Old day when the last chinese emperor were brought down, The Republic of China was created and their flag was the the one that Taiwan use today. After Japan’s surrender of WW II, the communist, who fought most of the rebel against the Japanese, waged a civil war aginst the Nationalist, who are the de jure government of Republic of China. Because the Communist and the Nationalist strive on different belief, they are not compatible with each other. In the end of a 4-year war, the communist won; and the Nationalist flee to Taiwan, hoping to someday take back all of the mainland China they lost! Therefore, there are two government, both claim all of china: One,the Republic of China, which control the territory of Taiwan and some outlying island which in a big group is referred to simply as "Taiwan." Two, the PRC which control all of other territory in the chinese mainland.

Many Taiwanese politicians stress the need for Taiwan to be independent, and some say that Taiwan will declare its independence in the next year or two. But when these politicians are asked from whom Taiwan will declare its independence, they usually give unclear answers.

As we know, when the Republic of China was founded in 1912, Taiwan was part of Japan. After WWII, upon the surrender of Japanese troops in Taiwan on Oct. 25, 1945, the military occupation of Taiwan began, but there wasn’t any transfer of sovereignty on that date. In the post war San Francisco Peace Treaty, Japan renounced the sovereignty of Taiwan, but the Republic of China was not designated as the "receiving country." In summary, there are no international legal documents which can prove that Taiwan belongs to the ROC.

As a result, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) cannot claim Taiwan based on the "successor government theory," because Taiwan was never owned by the ROC in the first place ……

Only US can declare.

***Reuploaded with new music***
Long version of Roc Taiwan Sro’s event. After hours of fighting, Roc went into safe zone with 95%+ hp.

Like this music? More at http://www.dubstep.fm radio

Taiwan Sro website
www.sro.com.tw

Duration : 0:10:35

Read the rest of this entry »

Since Taiwan’s true legal status is as an occupied territory of the United States (with the US as the "principal occupying power" and the landless ROC merely as a "subordinate occupying power"), why does the US seem to want to keep this status a secret?

Based on the US Senate ratified San Francisco Peace Treaty (SFPT), Taiwan is occupied territory of the United States of America.

* The United States is the principal occupying power of all geographic areas within the scope of the SFPT, as per Article 23(a). United States Military Government (USMG) jurisdiction over Taiwan is active, as confirmed by SFPT Article 4(b). Military government is the form of administration by which an occupying power exercises governmental authority over occupied territory. 

For Taiwan, no US federal government recognized "civil government" (of the ROC, PRC, or any other country) has ever supplanted USMG jurisdiction over Taiwan. Hence, USMG jurisdiction over Taiwan remains active here in the 21st century.

In terms of the military occupation of Taiwan, there is a principal – agent relationship between the Republic of China and the United States. The Republic of China on Taiwan is (1) a subordinate occupying power, beginning Oct. 25, 1945, and (2) a government in exile, beginning mid-December 1949. The ROC exercises effective territorial control over the areas of Formosa and the Pescadores, but not sovereignty.

There is going to be some very serious explaining to do for the gross negligence of the Asia Desk at the US Dept. of State (DOS). None of the key individuals have used proper caution but have engaged in reckless political expediency at the expense of the civil rights of the native persons on this unincorporated territory. It is not even going to be possible to realistically ever claim ignorance or incompetence in any of these issues of SFPT. These officials are truly too professionally competent and have a traceable pattern of political agendas including some DOI Inspector-General investigations linking the Dept. of Interior and the Asia Desk at the Dept. of State.

In regard to the court case Lin et. al. v. United States of America, currently being adjudicated in Washington D.C., if writs of mandamus are to be sought, they should be directed to the Dept. of Defense (DOD) jurisdiction of SFPT. The Inspector-General at DOD has recent history of investigating some Pro-China military officials in Hawaii. It is believed that there are links to the DOS and DOI. Since the Taiwan cession is TRA qualified as unincorporated territory under USMG, federal investigations by proper authorities (DIA) will be a national security issue.

For Taiwan, there has been no administrative authority transfer other than that delegated to the ROC and reaffirmed by TRA. However, to the extent that this delegated administrative authority is blocking the Taiwanese people’s enjoyment of "fundamental rights" under the US Constitution, it is void.

Fundamental rights include life, liberty, property, and due process of law, among others.

Roc in Taiwan SRO.

Duration : 0:5:37

Read the rest of this entry »

I’m an Chinese.Because I think that PRC belongs to ROC long long ago.Why does Communist Party and PRC people says Taiwan want to Split?I think is PRC being independent.I hate PRC(Though I’m born in PRC).I and Taiwanese need your help.Please support us!!Let PRC returns ROC!Thanks

ROC is the true government of the people. I support the ROC.

Hong Kong was leased to the British for 99 years but the lease was signed under Qing China. The lease didn’t specify which China Hong Kong would be returned to because neither the ROC or the PRC existed back then. During the 80s and 90s when the transfer agreement of power between Britain and China was worked out, did the British ever consider handing Hong Kong back to the Republic of China rather than the People’s Republic? The ROC was fast becoming a full democracy in the 80s and its economy was becoming fully developed as well. On paper, didn’t Hong Kong and Taiwan have more in common with each other than HK and PRC? And if Taiwan was offered Hong Kong, would it have accepted the offer?

The answer is: who has more guns and bodies to waste on the subject, and is closer geographically. (and linked physically with a bridge.)

England was dealing with military and commercial realities. Freedom comes from financial independence. HK depends more on China for its interests than on Britain. (notice all the factories across the strait- owned by the HK people.) It no longer was earning much of a payback for England to continue pumping more cash to develop a place far outside of their military protection. It was a calculated loss for England and a gain for China. (PRC) HK got its finances from England (formerly) and with many partnerships in China since the 1980s.

Taiwan has few interests in HK. It does not produce anything inside its area that Taiwan does not already have, and its only valid interest up to that point was as a neutral go between for negotiation between the two governments. Taiwanese also really don’t have much of a claim to owning China anymore, and no ability to retake it, thus no financial resources to maintain strong military control points over HK which is outside of the sphere of influence of Taiwan.

The one thing they DO have is the ability to defend their primary island areas. It does not have a particularly able strike capacity at the current time, and the decreasing population pressure means that there is no motive for expansion, unlike China which has the same motive that all expansionist government have as their basis- to get rid of its masses onto other areas that can feed them better.

China mostly solved some of its overwhelming population pressure in the 70′s by starving over 20 million people and instituting draconian single child regulations. It still is a hop, skip and jump from complete collapse unless some environmental checks are put into place and enforced without exception, no matter the position of the players in that area. The overall group of people in China can no longer afford to indulge selfish personal desires of greedy game players.

Basically it spares a messy, drawn out military conflict that was not particularly needed or desired by any of the players of the game.

Taiwan meets its expansionist pressure by using other, more socially acceptable ways to get away from overpopulated and overdeveloped areas. It uses technological innovations and trade, and chooses to waste less money on military games and flaunting its muscles openly in smelly messy ways. (which tends to cause too much collateral damage and spiritual/mental waste.)

This clip is the second version of the ROC Military to dedicate to those who are serving in protecting democracy and freedom in Taiwan. Enjoy ^_^

Duration : 0:3:45

Read the rest of this entry »